29 Hours, One Seat: World’s Longest ‘Direct’ Flight Shanghai To Buenos Aires Coming In December

China Eastern will operate a 29-hour twice-weekly “direct” flight from Shanghai to Buenos Aires, via Auckland. On paper this becomes the world’s longest “direct” passenger flight — with a return block pushing ~29 hours. “Direct” here means one flight number and the same aircraft the whole way, even with a stop. It’s not non-stop but equivalnet to Qantas’ direct Sydney – London service that stops in Singapore, but a few hours longer.

Effective December 4, 2025:

  • Shanghai – Auckland, 2:00 a.m. 6:30 p.m. MU745
    Auckland – Buenos Aires, 8:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. MU745 (25.5 hours)

    Buenos Aires – Auckland, 2:00 a.m. – 8:40 a.m+1. MU746
    Auckland – Shanghai, 10:40 a.m.+1 – 6:00 p.m.+1, MU746 (29 hours)

The flight will be operated by a 3-cabin Boeing 777-300ER. China Eastern announced the route in June with New Zealand’s Prime Minister at the Auckland airport. China Eastern was already flying Shanghai – Auckland and adds fifth-freedom Auckland – Buenos Aires. The airport suggests this brings NZ$48m in annual visitor spending and China Eastern promotes shorter travel time between Shanghai and Buenos Aires versus a transatlantic routing with more limited time zone swings.

“Direct” flights can involve a stop. This is not non-stop. The Shanghai – Buenos Aires city pair via Auckland measures 12,229 miles. That beats the previous longest direct, Sydney – London Heathrow. Auckland is attractive for geography and because New Zealand is liberalizing Chinese transit visa rules. Less attractive would actually be flying the route in economy.

Standard reporting on the flight is that throgh passengers will remain on board the whole time. However the flight will carry local traffic (Shanghai – Auckland passengers, as carried currently, and Auckland – Buenos Aires passengers only). So it’s not clear to me whether passengers will actually remain onboard or in the sterile transit area.

People transiting through Auckland must stay in the transit area of the airport, for a maximum period of 24 hours without visa. It is possible to remain in transit (1) on board the arrival aircraft, (2) in an immigration control area, or (3) in the custody of the police. So onboard is possible.

The “Transit & Transfer area” at Auckland requires passengers to go through security screening to enter for the next flight.

Normally I would have expected passengers to deplane and then everyone to board together (through and originating passengers). This isn’t just a refueling technical stop. However, it’s possible that things could be arranged for passengers to remain onboard. I’m not sure that’s better.

Nonetheless, there will need to be ground handling (fuel, catering, possibly decontamination and cleaning). I haven’t found an official China Eastern or Auckland Airport notice regarding this.

Of course actual non-stops are a different beast.

# Route Airline Distance (mi) Scheduled block
1 SIN–JFK Singapore Airlines 9,537 18:50
2 SIN–EWR Singapore Airlines 9,535 18:25
3 DOH–AKL Qatar Airways 9,032 17:35
4 PER–LHR Qantas 9,009 17:20
5 MEL–DFW Qantas 8,992 17:35
6 AKL–JFK Air New Zealand 8,828 17:50
7 DXB–AKL Emirates 8,824 17:10
8 SIN–LAX Singapore Airlines 8,770 17:50
9 BLR–SFO Air India 8,701 17:40
10 IAH–SYD United 8,596 17:35

Qantas’ Project Sunrise is set to eventually become the longest, flying nonstop from Sydney to New York JFK and to London Heathrow. That’s still planned for 2027.

(HT: Paddle Your Own Kanoo)

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Comments

  1. Wow… that’s brutal. I remember flying JFK-PVG before the pandemic (cheap flight, 1-stop to SE Asia), and it was ‘not pretty’ in the back (like, scary ‘mystery meat’ for a meal). That was like 15 hours. I cannot imagine double that. Yikes.

  2. Interesting, but I wouldn’t do it, even in business. Post-pandemic, I think more people are comfortable that they can work any time, any where, so don’t really need to shorten travel time in a way that is uncomfortable.

  3. @GUWonder — Those ‘deals’ haven’t really returned since the pandemic.

    MU, CZ, and CA used to undercut Western carriers by like half, (and dirt cheap in Economy, think $500 RT from EWR to BKK, 1 stop), but, in recent years, they’ve really scaled back, and, even then, the NYC-PROC routes are extremely expensive. Like, do a quick search for JFK-PEK. +$20K/person Business Class?! Used to be like $5K.

    And I don’t think many tourists, students, or business persons from USA are really going there anymore. Frédéric Bastiat is credited with saying, “When goods don’t cross borders, Soldiers will.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *