Southwest Airlines is something of a mess for customers these days. It’s also becoming something of a mess for flight attendants – the one true strength left at the airline. Employees at Southwest are unique among airlines in appearing not to be unhappy at their jobs.
Their enthusiasm makes flights more enjoyable for customers and makes customers loyal – even as hard as management is currently trying to light that loyalty on fire (checked bag fees, curbside check-in fees, seat fees, expiration of travel credits, devaluation of Rapid Rewards).
The flight attendants union – which represents about 20,000 flight attendants and has long embodied the premise that a customer-facing work group could be unionized and still provide exemplary service – appears to be in the midst of an internal scandal, based on documents and correspondence reviewed by View From The Wing. Transport Workers Union Local 556 faces allegations of retaliation, misconduct, and misuse of internal union procedures.
- On January 16, 2024, while the union was still negotiating its latest contract, charges were filed against four flight attendants for supposedly advocating decertification of the union. Two months later the charges were withdrawn, with the complainant citing the need to avoid division and misuse of union resources.
In a March 19 e‑mail titled “URGENT: Withdraw of Article XIX Charges” he said the process would “divert our collective focus” and asked that the case be dropped. In response, the union reported that charges “have been rescinded.”
- However, two weeks later, a union officer gained access to the original charges and is accused of refiling them nearly word-for-word under her own name, reinstating disciplinary charges. A union officer is accused of improperly sharing the withdrawn confidential documents.
- The member who filed the original complained calls it “my original writing/penned, not a template.” Screenshots show the union officer writing about their re-using the text because the Executive Board had already deemed it proper. Trial notices went out, ordering the four attendants to appear at a Dallas hotel.
- Last month the copy‑and‑paste job became public to flight attendants on Facebook. One of the targets filed counter‑charges accusing officers of retaliation, misrepresentation, and misuse of confidential union records.
The union officers are accused of violating multiple sections of TWU’s Article XIX—including misrepresentation, willful harm to union members, and unauthorized disclosure of internal documents in furtherance of an effort to silence discussions around potentially changing union representation, which could be found to constitute federally protected under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act.
As a result, one of the targeted flight attendants is demanding immediate exoneration for the group, formal disciplinary proceedings against the union officers, a full audit of resources used in the process, and public acknowledgment of the misconduct.
- At stake for Southwest flight attendants is their ability to freely debate union representation without fear of retaliatory discipline.
- The Labor‑Management Reporting and Disclosure Act guarantees union members the right to debate and campaign for different representation without reprisal. Discipline aimed at stifling that speech can trigger Department of Labor action and even personal liability for the officers involved.
- Under TWU’s constitution it appears that using recycled, withdrawn language may violate bans on misrepresentation and wrongful harm. And under the Railway Labor Act, airline unions owe members a duty not to act arbitrarily or in bad faith. A disciplinary trial built on rescinded allegations appears tailor‑made for a lawsuit over the union’s duty of fair representation.
Ironically, the alleged retaliation may fuel the very movement the union hoped to quash. In fact, there is a GoFundMe for creating an independent union – the Southwest Airlines Flight Attendants Association. That’s hardly unprecedented.
- American Airlines flight attendants are currently represented by their own independent union.
- United flight attendants are represented by the Association of Flight Attendants, which is part of Communication Workers of America which is itself affiliated with the AFL-CIO. (TWU is also affiliated with the AFL-CIO.)
- Delta flight attendants, whose pay and benefits have set the standards that United, American and others have negotiated against, are non-union.
However, getting to 50% of flight attendants signing decertification cards seems like a stretch – especially in the midst of chaos at the airline, and after what’s broadly considered a succesful contract negotiation.
Unfortunately, flight attendants are paying for all of this. Legal fees come out of dues. An audit, currently being demanded, would make those costs public. So the union would be best off dropping ‘copy-paste trials’, holding an open Article XIX hearing on the counter‑charges (even if just for truth and reconciliation), and publishing an accounting of legal spend on the matter. That would end the story inside the union hall rather than risking spilling over onto a federal docket.
I reached out to TWU Local 556 for comment and they offered “TWU Local 556 does not comment on internal Member issues, nor does the Union endorse the communication of internal Member issues by other parties.”
If SWA was smart, it would offer to negotiate with the flight attendants AFTER they vote to decertify the union. Then negotiate parity with other airlines on a give and take basis. Then, if they are smarter, promise good faith negotiations without a union going forward.
Gone are the days of Herb Kelleher and the Southwest Group Hugs! Welcome to the real world LUV!!!
Whatever the members want, if that’s what they want, but it sounds like a lot of speculation with the inevitable anti-union comments here to follow.
How about pay workers more, treat them better, and get better service; seems good for consumers.
Would be nice if the investors could see that it helps them too in the long run. Oh, what’s that? Short term wins are all that matter? Got it. What a shame. Maybe we are due for a recession.
Sooo glad I don’t work here anymore!
Southwest flight attendants need to look at the big picture. Actions by a hostile investor (Elliott Investment Management) are forcing the company to eliminate company policies which, for years, have created a cult-like following among the flying public. “Bags fly free” has been eliminated and open seating will soon be going away. The airline is also unable to get new planes that it has ordered because the FAA refuses to certify the Boeing MAX 700 as being airworthy even though the Max 800 and Max 900 have achieved certification. In a nutshell, Southwest (WN) will be losing much of it’s loyal passenger base because their passengers, like passengers of other airlines, now have to pay $35 or more for each bag checked and they could also pay additional costs to sit where they want to sit. I recently flew a WN round trip Tampa FL / Burbank CA. I did not have to pay to check bags or choose my seat because my travel was booked before the May 28 cut-off date. The routing involved changing planes in both directions. When I again make this trip in the future, I will likely use one of the three carriers that offer non stop flights between Tampa and Los Angeles-LAX since the ancillary charges on those carriers will be about the same as I will have to pay Southwest. Multiply this experience by hundreds of thousands of passengers and the prognosis for WN’s long term survival becomes very poor.
Unions for Anything are a complete Fiasco….they should ALL be Constitutionally Banned !!!
Stealing someone’s published work “word-for-word” and presenting it as your own is a big no-no.
The FA should sue the local 556 and sit back and watch the show.
Discovery would be fun, followed by a financial settlement (not in Rapid Reward points). Wanna Get Away?
SW got no dog in this hunt! This is an internal dispute among it’s employees. I’d urge, those of you who are anti- (anti-) Union … you’ve not worked with the protection of a Union. The theory that Labor is always at war with Management … that wasn’t my experience. We worked together to make the company grow. Later in life I was Management. Instead of a half-dozen coming in with their story I’d go to lunch with the Union Business Manager, quickly solve the issue. And vice-versa.
The decertification efforts are made by some tiny little men and some disenfranchised women who demand transparency and freedom of speech, but routinely delete comments, ban coworkers from spaces promoting free speech, turn employees into management, doxx rank and file members on the internet by publishing their home address, sexually harassing colleagues by posting lewd photographs of them in hopes of company discipline (without any nexus to the company in which they work for), and if you disagree with them – off with ye head! Not my fish, not my pond, yall are a bunch of yahoos. No surprise Gary Leff would publish this piece, these efforts aren’t gaining traction anywhere else. Hell, even Reddit laughed them off the internet. Credibility? Who’s she.
“..they should ALL be Constitutionally Banned !!!” That’s too extreme and would represent a violation of individual rights. The solution is easy; unfortunately, it’s next to impossible to implement. The government needs to remove all laws related to unions and allow employment “contracts” to be determined by voluntary agreements.
The union official also reported someone from this group to their management. The silver lining here is the company refused to discipline this rank and file member when the union official “told on him.” Looks like the Charlene Carter case has been helpful in stopping management from firing rank and file stews for protected union activities !! Dissidents rejoice. Protected union speech is back at 556! Management ain’t doing 556’s dirty work anymore!
Wow, @Doc423 went too far for @Mike P, that’s a first! Fellas, we’ll be lucky if the Constitution is still enforced anyways. Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em!