The TSA isn’t very good at finding dangerous items going through security checkpoints, so they can’t let you bring in bullets even without a gun for firing them.
There’s a good chance you might find a gun airside to use them in. The gun might have been left by air marshals in the bathroom (Michael Corleone-style). Or they might have been taken through accidentally by a police officer or by a marine.
TSA policy allows you to bring empty shell casings with the primer removed or discharged. So bullets that have been disabled and cannot be fired are fine.
Unless that bullet could keep your drink cold in which case they’re going to confiscate it. Since they have plenty of abandoned drinks at the checkpoint they want their drinks to be cold.
The TSA reports seizing six whiskey stones shaped like bullets. If you want to keep your whiskey cold but don’t want to let it get watered down, whiskey stones are your answer.
According to TSA,
- Whiskey stones are fine to pack in carry on bags
- Disabled bullets that cannot be fired are fine to pack in carry on bags
- Whiskey stones shaped like bullets cannot be brought in carry on bags
The agency acknowledges that “[t]hese of course are not dangerous, and we’re not posting them to try and say we saved the day by finding them.”
As of this writing their social share has garnered over 9000 likes, which is 9000 more than the number of terrorists the agency has ever caught. And please don’t tell me they deter terrorists when they miss 90%+ of the dangerous items going through the checkpoint and the agency itself has admitted there aren’t any active plots against US aviation.
(HT: Hit and Run)
Seems odd they’d admit they aren’t dangerous but confiscated them anyway. If you know something isn’t dangerous, why take it? My entire bag is full of things known to be not dangerous. Seems like the exact opposite of what they should be doing.
TSA – Making up the rules in the war on beverages since 2001.
To me this tweet should have pointed out how they are techincally ok but to avoid confusion and delays at security please put in checked bags.
Related to DaninMCI comment: Still remember in Europe the war on contact solution. I need it for my contacts. Unfortunately, the size of contact solution was about 120ml which is over the limit of 100ml. I had my contact solution confiscated several times at Heathrow and once at DeGaul.
Another totally unrelated nit. I just realized that “shrinkification” has struck again. While writing this comment, I noticed that the new bottles of Boston Simplus are now 105ml instead of the 120ml. In other words, a 14% price increase. Yet, according to the USA Bureau of Labor statistics, the CPI-U has increased ONLY (1.5% + 1.6% + 0.1% + 1.3% +2.1%)/5+=1.3% from 2013 to 2017. I am willing to bet these economist yahoos have not fully considered the impact of shinkification.
“TSA policy allows you to bring empty shell casings with the primer removed or discharged. So bullets that have been disabled and cannot be fired are fine.”
“empty shell casing” != bullet.
A bullet that cannot be fired is *not* fine. If the shell casing still has the bullet in it, it will be confiscated even if there is no powder or primer.
Came here to say what Kurt said. The policy is still ridiculous, but “replica” bullets violate the policy.