The Airlines Confidential podcast hosted former American Airlines CEO Bob Crandall. One of the most interesting pieces of the discussion came after Crandall dropped off. Host and former Spirit Airlines CEO Ben Baldanza told a story about Bob Crandall and paying minute attention to costs.
In my first year working for American Airlines, so this was back in the mid-1980s, and I was just out of college and went to this meeting that Bob used to host in the first quarter of each year he would go out to lots of stations and what what were called Presidents Conferences or Presidents meetings…he’d go and he’d give an update on the company to employees and answer questions, it was great.
So I’m sitting there, been with the company for a couple of months, and this question comes up…as part of the answer Bob says “everybody look down here at the front, this is Bob, Bob runs our Oklahoma City station. Bob, tell everybody here how much you spent on rags at your station last month.”
..Bob says something, and Crandall looks up and with a finger says “I’m telling all of you people who run airports out there, if you don’t know how much you spent on rags last month you don’t know enough about your station.”
Baldanza relayed that he “thought of that story throughout my entire career” about the importance of sweating all of the details. Baldanza of course was very concerned with costs at Spirit Airlines
Bob Crandall Was Known For Attention To Costs
There’s a famous story about Bob Crandall insisting that an olive get removed was the CEO he told the story of from first class salads to save the airline $40,000 a year. One olive multiplied by every seat in first class, across every flight every day, over a full year adds up. And $40,000 is a lot if you take that decision and multiply it out across every employee making a cost-saving decision in every element of the business.
Sometimes Crandall’s stories seem apocryphal but they serve a purpose – to communicate an extreme attention to costs. In another story about diving into the minute details of expenses at a single outstation, he even claimed to have replaced a night watchman with a sign about a guard dog.
These Stories Reflect A Unique Insight Into What It Takes To Make A Business Profitable
What Crandall intuitively understands is that passenger airlines are a low margin business (outside of areas where government limits competition, such as through slot controls, foreign ownership rules, bans on cabotage, and long-term leases on gates at government airports that block new competitors).
As a result it’s crucial to guard against cost disease and expense creep.
Crandall used his stories to make his point about attention to detail to keep costs low without noticeably sacrificing quality.
Airlines Experience Cost Disease
Cost disease, attributable to William Baumol, describes increased labor costs for jobs despite not seeing comparable increases in productivity. The happens in part due to rising salaries elsewhere in the economy. Economist Alex Tabarrok explains,
In 1826, when Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 14 was first played, it took four people 40 minutes to produce a performance. In 2010, it still took four people 40 minutes to produce a performance. Stated differently, in the nearly 200 years between 1826 and 2010, there was no growth in string quartet labor productivity.
…Fortunately, most other sectors of the economy have experienced substantial growth in labor productivity since 1826. …In 1826 the average hourly wage for a production worker was $1.14. In 2010 the average hourly wage for a production worker was $26.44, approximately 23 times higher in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. Growth in average labor productivity has a surprising implication: it makes the output of slow productivity-growth sectors (relatively) more expensive. In 1826, the average wage of $1.14 meant that the 2.66 hours needed to produce a performance of Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 14 had an opportunity cost of just $3.02. At a wage of $26.44, the 2.66 hours of labor in music production had an opportunity cost of $70.33. Thus, in 2010 it was 23 times (70.33/3.02) more expensive to produce a performance of Beethoven’s String Quartet No. 14 than in 1826.
Union work rules preserve headcount. So do government safety rules – you need a flight attendant for each 50 seats on board an aircraft. Compensation rises with seniority, too – even though an employee doesn’t necessarily become more productive, they’re paid more. The longer an airline has been in business, with average seniority increasing, its labor costs rise even though those employees aren’t producing more flying.
One area where airlines may benefit long term from the pandemic is in cost-cutting by eliminating management positions (several airlines shaved about 30% of headcount here) and retiring older aircraft. There may also temporarily forestall increased labor costs. Some airlines have had success in buying out more senior unionized employees such that their labor costs on each trip will be lower going forward as well.
Supply Costs Go Up Year After Year, Too
Large organizations – like major airlines – can become sclerotic in other areas as well. Managers who might have once paid attention to the cost of rags in a single station have a difficult time paying attention at that level of detail, and communicating cost control in rags at the station level, when they rise to become senior executives. They pick and choose their battles, and rag expenses rise at each station year after year because each small expense isn’t worth the tradeoff in their time to pay attention to.
But since employees generally incur the consequences of higher spending on rags or any other single item, they don’t hold costs down. They accept minor cost increases year over year rather than shopping vendors or engaging in difficult negotiations over small amounts. People get lazy, or are bad at their jobs. And those small cost increases compound over time.
Meanwhile executive pay has gone up a few thousand percent. Makes you wonder.
@Mon Exactly! Meanwhile workers have to pay more for healthcare. Especially for the non-union employees.
Using an orchestra cost to perform a piece of music is a fail to me. The almost 200 hundred years is too big a span of time.
Companies, in any industry have opportunities to save on costs. Most don’t because it would mean things that management enjoys would have to be cut as well. I know what both sides look like and the excessiveness that goes on the management side is disgusting.
I would much rather cut costs, than cut off my wiener
The whole exec compensation set up is flawed. If a ceo gets paid to make the tough decisions it is the front liners who’s hard work keeps the company profitable.
Execs are paid a fair wage.
You are describing the creeping increases of travel in a business. Every year the costs go up, yet there’s no impact on the top line from all this travel, as COVID-19 showed. Turns out that much business travel has been a great waste of $.
And back then American was a very good airline too.
I doubt Crandall is thrilled that American now has the highest labor costs per seat mile because its current CEO embraced labor in order to get them to back the merger between USAirways and American and leaves American with tens of thousands more employees than Delta or United, even adjusted for the amount of work that each airline does in-house (which is falling as American sends more and more overhauls offshore).
Add in American’s massive debt service costs due to massive purchases of new aircraft which never delivered a system level cost advantage and its billion dollar headquarters complex, American will always be a high-cost airline and vulnerable to competition. Crandall recognized the importance of maximizing revenues while minimizing costs, principles that are lost on American’s current executive regime.
Just to point out, cutting costs is not always the way to maximize profits. You also have to have a product that people will buy compared to the alternatives.
Business history is full of companies that cut costs so far they destroyed the quality of their product and their brand and lost their customers.
Ruthlessly cutting costs looks great when you’re in the chair for a few quarters collecting the resulting short-term profits. The people who have to pick up the pieces after the company is gutted and has lost all ability to drive strategic differentiation from competitors probably would disagree.
Man I miss Bob running AA. When I started flying mainly AA in the early 90s (lived in DFW area at the time) he was still in charge. Unions hated the man and he could be very tough on labor but he was a brilliant leader and rarely made a bad decision regarding the airline. I know if he was in charge today (of any airline, not just AA) it would be run much better and more efficiently.
Shame on cutting costs at the expense of employee jobs and compensation.I am in the minority who would rather pay more to assure that everyone has a job and is paid a living wage – olives be damned
The one issue with Crandall’s method is shown by a story we use in automotive, if Gary takes 1lb of air from a full tire everything is fine and we save money. If I take 1lb of air from a full tire everything is fine and we save money. And Dougie Parker takes 2 lbs of air from a full tire and it’s fine and we save money. And Bob Crandall takes a 1lb of air from a full tire and everything is fine and money is saved.
But when you take a full tire and apply if these it is now 5lbs low and everything is not fine. hence you get today’s AA
AC totally nails it!! Here’s what separated Bob Crandall from the stereo type “cut costs and the and customer satisfaction by dammed.” During his long run, American was always at the top of the Leader Board of airline customer service and satisfaction There were stringent controls and measurements in place to monitor and insure this. Even with hindsight it is very hard to point out anything hat was cut or eliminated that eroded the product our bill payers received…our customs and passengers. . I think I can a safety speak for hundreds of fellow contemporaries that served under him as field managers, once we understood what was expected and the level of detail we must be involved within our operations, we not only became much better managers, but it imparted a lasting true appreciation for him and all that we were able to accomplish under his visionary stewardship.