Marriott’s Courtyard Beaumont appears to be selling rooms even though they are not open?
A Marriott guest booked a room at the property. When they showed up, the parking lot was empty – and the hotel was closed. They had a confirmation number, but we all know making a reservation is the easy part. It’s actually delivering on it that is hard.
The guest reports that hotel’s direct phone number was disconnected. After about ten minutes, someone emerged from the open front door stating that the hotel was closed and that canceling the reservation—even late—would incur no charge. How could it possibly incur a charge? Eventually they found a room at a Residence Inn in Port Arthur, stuck with a rate of $300 per night.
Credit: Courtyard Beaumont, Texas
Many guests comment that the property had appeared unmaintained, suggesting it was “in desperate need of repairs and a deep cleaning.” It may have been better off closed! But clearly the hotel should have contacted all guests with reservations – and kept contacting them!
I note that the Beaumont property is franchised and run by InterMountain Management. Remember, just because you go to Marriott to book a Marriott doesn’t mean you’re staying at a Marriott (or in this case, not staying).
It occurred to me that the Marriott Bonvoy member should have invoked the ‘Ultimate Reservation Guarantee’ for cash compensation, however the fact that the hotel is closed lets them weasel out of it,
4.3 Elite Membership Benefits at Participating Brands
iii. Ultimate Reservation Guarantee. To be eligible, Member’s Loyalty Program Member Number and a valid credit card number must be included with the reservation. If a Participating Property is unable to honor the reservation, it will pay for comparable accommodation nearby for the Elite Member that night and compensate the Member for the inconvenience. A Participating Property must be open and operational for the Ultimate Reservation Guarantee benefit/compensation to apply
Surely Marriott and the property should cover the cost difference between the original booking and the Marriott property they moved to, however?
This reminds me of another recent story: Marriott hotel in Canada appears to be fully booked by the government to house homeless. But they sell rooms to Bonvoy members through Marriott channels, and just move them to a non-Marriott property. The Marriott reservations guarantee is claimed not to apply because the hotel isn’t open and operational for guests even though it holds itself out on Marriott’s website to be open and operational for guests.
We know that Marriott has been essentially lighting its brand on fire, allowing owners to run amok in the CEO’s quest for net rooms growth. But even against that backdrop, letting these practices go on is ridiculous.
Bonvoy “elites”: if you choose to stay in an abusive relationship, that’s on you. I have no sympathy. If you have a shred of self respect left then leave them.
It seems like this could be a consumer protection issue in states or jurisdictions with such laws. In the case of the Toronto Fairfield, impacted customers should file a complaint with the Ontario government: https://www.tico.ca/consumers/file-a-complaint
The worst part is that Marriott has taken all the fun out of the verb Bonvoy. It’s so widely used to refer to so many Marriott-specific phenomena that it practically doesn’t mean anything, just like Marriott’s T&Cs.
Don’t think it’s what JW Marriott had in mind. The company has become devoid of morality in such a short period.
Maybe Marriott thought the experience would be improved without any of those pesky hotel staff around?
I could be wrong but I would assume a franchise has to get approval from corporate for a renovation. Corporate sets the standards for design, etc. So someone at corporate should know the property was set to undergo a renovation. I would also assume that a franchise has to get permission from corporate to totally close for a renovation. So again, someone at corporate should know. This should trigger someone at corporate taking a property offline from the Marriott booking channels. So it would seem that Marriott corporate dropped the ball as much as the franchisee.
81% of the time you stay at a Marriott, it is a franchise managed property.
As of the end of 2023, Marriott International’s global portfolio consisted of nearly 8,800 properties across 139 countries and territories. Of these, approximately 7,192 properties were franchised, accounting for about 81.7% of Marriott’s total properties. Additionally, 1,981 properties were managed by Marriott but not owned, representing roughly 22.5% of the portfolio, and 51 properties were both owned and managed by Marriott, comprising about 0.6% of the total.
LMFAO. Sue.
This is how you cut costs of operation. Just close your operations.
Exactly why I have ZERO Marriott bookings this year.
No longer worth the pain.