News and notes from around the interweb:
- No notice: Marriott eliminates 10% bonus on transfers to United, increases bonus on 60,000 point transfers
- Etihad’s new award chart eliminating redemption sweet spots
- Qatar Airways CEO offers to tell Lufthansa all the mistakes they made with their new business class
- JetBlue becoming less flexible with travel credits the government did say in their anti-trust lawsuit that they prefer the Spirit Airlines business model, so… No notice change, natch.
- A man on a Southwest Airlines flight watched one too many Andrew Tate videos, it seems, and declares he’s willing to go to jail for his family after a man apparently accidentally bumped into his wife in the aisle. And that’s why this happened:
Thank you for flying with southwest today. I was late getting home because of this right here 🤣 pic.twitter.com/6e9qEthBwh
— Desert Honey’s Sweet Tees (@dhsweettees) March 7, 2023
- Do better, Lufthansa Group.
Needless to say, Eurowings objects. But it'll have half the penalty suspended and the DOT doesn't care that a relief crew was delayed by weather or security lines. Also, how does it take a crew 90 minutes to clear security at FLL?
Full filing: https://t.co/fGuYEHJRuS.
— Seth Miller (@WandrMe) March 8, 2023
The only jetBlue travel credits I have are for the $5.60 security fees. As I understand it, jetBlue some time ago decided that these cannot be used to pay security fees on new tickets purchased with points. How petty of them.
While the Etihad partner award chart is now live, it seems that online partner award redemptions are not. It still said to call in. (It is Friday in Abu Dhabi as I write this.)
@nsx — they are doing you a favor. By paying the $5.60 fee with Amex you get travel interruption insurance.
Deregulation at its best.
What do people who voted in favor of deregulation were expecting? That companies would not abuse their market power?? Ahahahah.
Hi Gary,
I quite agree with Amy!
This is certainly deregulation at its best.What do you expect when you voted in favor of deregulation? These companies would never want to abuse their market power
“No notice” should be hyphenated.
I am assuming the “How can they keep doing this?” was tongue in cheek to say the least, Gary. How they can “keep doing this” is (reasons you should love, given your policy positions!): 1) deregulation, 2) T&Cs that clearly given them the authority to make no-notice changes at any time, 3) and the fact that the market will bear these changes – travel spend is still on an all-time tear. So I hope any exasperation or surprise was intended as comedy.
Well, no, that one is no longer valid, according to Feredeal law, and anyone who wishes can sue Marriott for the change without notice and possibly prevail…
Changing Your Terms and Conditions? If So, Your Company Must Provide Express Notice to Consumers according to the law (see: Stover v. Experian Holdings, Inc., No. 19-55204 (9th Cir. 2020))
“The Ninth Circuit recently reminded companies that they must provide notice to consumers when they change their terms and conditions, even where original terms state that they are subject to change at-will and at any time (i.e. the original contract contains a “change-of-terms” provision). Without express notice to the consumer, any change is unenforceable. “
Just so we’re clear on “voting for deregulation,” it was the Carter Administration that implemented airline deregulation. It has been in place for over 40 years. I agree with you in that there needs to be some level of regulation/consumer protection in place. But, let’s correctly recognize how we got here.
The miles posted immediately re: Marriott to United as did the bonus miles.
@Efogator
Not sure what ballots you got, but I’ve never had the opportunity to vote on deregulation of airlines.
The regulation has been fantastic for The Average Joe’s pocketbook. I remember one time seeing Affair of around $650 round trip from Atlanta to Miami and this was probably 35 years ago today you can probably make that same trip if you search real hard for 119 in today’s money that $650 today would probably be $1,800 so as bad as I hated Carter I think this is one good thing he did for the average United States citizen. The only thing he didn’t do was go far enough.. he should have eliminated cabotage laws which would have allowed foreign carriers to transport US citizens between cities inside the United States. That would have allowed for massive competition. I read a study where if foreign carrier such as Ryanair EasyJet and so on we’re allowed the transport people inside this country airfares would drop by around 17% more.
Deregulation not regulation. Sorry