Starting May 1, United Teams Must ‘Huddle’ Before Ousting Intoxicated Flyers—Here’s The Full Breakdown

United Airlines is changing how flight attendants deal with drunk passengers onboard. Effective May 1, two flight attendants both have to share the judgment that the passenger is over the line. That will trigger collaboration with operations and the airport to handle removal of the customer from the aircraft, as first reported by Live and Let’s Fly.

Here’s how they’re describing the ‘huddle process’ in internal communications.

After boarding, if two flight attendants independently observe a customer exhibiting red light behavior(s) the Inflight team will call a mandatory huddle between Inflight, Flight Ops and Airport Operations to facilitate customer removal from the aircraft. This new huddle process is designed to handle situations where red light behaviors may not have been visible during boarding and a customer that appears to be intoxicated makes their way onto an aircraft.

The ‘red light behaviors’ United is talking about refer to their guidance on different stages of intoxication:

Green Light Yellow Light Red Light
Sociable Reduced inhibitions Moving in slow motion
Relaxed Impaired judgment Need time to respond
Happy Talking or laughing loudly Glassy-eyed
Being overly friendly Losing train of thought
Arguing or baiting Irrational statements
Use of foul language Spilling drinks
Increasing alcohol use Walking awkwardly
Careless with money Stumbling or falling
Possible smell of alcohol Unable to sit upright
Slurred speech
Possible smell of alcohol

This approach – requiring two flight attendants to come to this judgment about a passenger and then ‘huddle’ with other involved teams helps avoid situations where a single employee takes it on themselves to kick off a passenger without justification (the captain will tend to back up their crew, even when unwarranted, and their judgment is virtually unrenewable under FAA rules) and it should also force everyone involved to play their part rather than letting bad behavior slide.

It’s also similar to a move that American Airlines made in the fall, taking away the ability for a single crewmember to remove passengers for odor, attire or attitude based on their own judgment alone. That followed review of an incident where eight black men who did not know each other and were not traveling together were removed from an aircraft over a reported body odor issue.

Under American’s new rules, no flight attendant can act alone – two crewmembers need to work on resolution of an issue (and for issues unrelated to safety or security, those concerns need to be raised by a passenger before any action is taken).

After the David Dao passenger dragging incident in 2017, United stopped calling law enforcement on customers outside of safety and security issues, and started doing de-escalation training with flight attendants. This training turned out to be useful during the pandemic – United was much less likely than American to divert flights over mask non-compliance. De-escalation rather than passenger removal is a good thing.

This strikes me as another positive change along the same lines, although honestly some ‘yellow light’ behavior including foul language, arguing, and impaired judgment – as well as being ‘overly friendly’ – would probably make me think that the passenger ought to be removed from the aircraft prior to pushback, out of concern for how things could escalate once airborne.

Airlines don’t want disturbances. They don’t want conflict between passengers, or risks for their crew. And they certainly don’t want the costs of a diversion – from labor costs and fuel to having aircraft out of position, delaying downline flights, and misconnecting passengers. They also have regulatory obligations to police intoxicated passengers. This policy appears to meet those goals.

No doubt the policy won’t please everyone. For instance, the national head of the flight attendants union that represents United’s cabin crew has argued for a ban on inflight alcohol entirely. In the past I would never have bothered to drink any alcohol on United at all, but now that they’re serving decent wine in long haul business class a couple of glasses are something to look forward to.

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Comments

  1. Does this mean that a passenger can not be cut off from alcohol service unless 2 FAs agree? Curiously, this is not the standard on the ground in most bars.

  2. They will have to pack parachutes to kick passengers off mid flight after flight attendants serve them too much.

  3. It makes perfect sense to have 2 FAs concur. What concerns me in the yellow behavior- kick their butts off too because they’re exhibiting obnoxious behavior. Will they withhold alcohol from the yellow flyers? Probably not and they will cause scene which we’ll be reading about in your blog. The red drinkers will probably pass out once they’re seated and cause no harm. I don’t think they should punish responsible drinkers, and not serve alcohol, for the behavior of irresponsible drinkers. Besides, I’m sure they make a lot of revenue on liquor sales.

  4. Booze in airports isn’t going anywhere as it’s a huge money maker. Remember the COVID freaks tried to stop online alcohol consumption on flights and there was even a time in which alcohol wasn’t served in coach during COVID.

    99.8% of the traveling public can act appropriately when flying. Punish the other .02% by putting on a No Fly List and prosecuting when they get out of hand. Trash tends to pile onto top of trash. In other words the .02% will realize how much they have to lose if they get trashed and act like trash in an airport or on an airplane.

  5. There are certainly activist flight attendants out there that think they are deputized. Glad there has to be some sort of group think now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *