19 Year Old Woman Will Do ANYTHING To Travel In Luxury (But Won’t Earn Miles)

In 2012 a site launched called Miss Travel (‘beautiful people travel free’) it was a sort of dating site largely for well off guys to meet young women who wanted to travel with them. One points blogger actually tried it out.

One woman though is dropping the pretense of meeting people for friendship and straight up offering sex at auction to fund her travels, starting price of $110,000.

A young woman planning to live a high life and travel in style is selling her virginity for over £84,000.

Ukranian Ekaterina, 19, originally from the city of Kharkiv, is now living in the United States.

…”I would like to travel, experience luxury and live my life and be happy…The Ukrainian has said that she wants to marry a man in the future who will be able to spend 10,000 EUR (£8,412) on her per month.

Doesn’t she know she can earn miles and travel comfortably instead?

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Comments

  1. I’m sure that there’s a lot of young women (or men for that matter) who would love to marry someone who will spend 10,000 Euros a month on them but are either less greedy or less obvious. It’d be ironic if she sells herself into white slavery.

  2. Oldest profession. We know what she is, and the price. It’s just an exchange rate issue, i.e., would she accept airfare paid in miles, and how would it be valued?

    Move along, folks. There’s nothing to see here.

  3. @Not John

    Believe it or not, that is a proper term meaning sex slavery, IIRC it hails back to the fact that the islamic pirates found white women (and probably young boys) especially attractive and would enslave them for sexual reasons.

    I guess it fell out of favor because it implies that white people are not in fact always the eeeeeeeeeeeevvvvviiiiillll oppressors that academia and the media libel us as.

    It also adds nuance to what Lucas meant by regretting selling Star Wars to the mouse as selling it to “white slavers”, basically they are raping his creation and maybe pimping it out.

  4. “Ukranian Ekaterina, 19, originally from the city of Kharkiv, is now living in the United States.”

    WTF? Isn’t this illegal in the US at least?

  5. Reminiscent of the old joke: Man meets woman, asks if she’ll sleep with him for a $1,000,000, she says yes. He says “okay, how about for $100”, she says “how dare you, what do you think I am, a prostitute”. He says “we’ve already established that, now we’re just haggling over the price.”

    Not very much different than a Wall Street trophy wife. Or Marla Maples or Melania Trump.

  6. @Not John There is wisdom in keeping quiet about terms you don’t understand … lest ye enjoys revealing your ignorance.

    Happy huntings snowflake.

  7. “Not very much different than a Wall Street trophy wife. Or Marla Maples or Melania Trump”
    – Harry [redacted]
    Dirty harry was entertaining. Pity we can’t say the same about Nasty Harry [redacted]

  8. RE: “white slavery”
    Or maybe the term implies that it’s somehow worse if we whites are enslaved, versus non-whites.
    It was a valid observation.

  9. Gary:

    I did NOT understand that my last name would be included in my comments and replies to my comments. Please remove my last name from all comments and replies.

    Thank you.

  10. What makes her any.different (other than refreshing honesty) than millions of women? Plenty of trollops willingly marry dirtbags like Trump so long as they are kept in style.

  11. Not much different than anyone (woman, Ladyboy, Trans….) that would spend any time with someone like Harry.

  12. I think this relates: Eddie Murphy in Raw (‘87 I think) talking about one of Johny Carson’s divorces: “…And I’ve had my share of p*ssy. I have yet… Even if the p*ssy was great and sparks shot out the woman’s a$$ and cannons blared and the mountains crumbled and the seas roared, no p*ssy is worth $150 million!…”

  13. She’s not the first…or the last . At least she is upfront about what she expects . A prospective customer should be able to find a similar experience at an entry level price.

  14. Gary: Although it’s difficult to edit Comments, those Comments which are simply gratuitous personal attacks against other Comments non-public figure authors, such as those above of L3 and Other Just Saying, should most definitely be removed.

    These personal attacks indicate much more about the authors (L3 and Other Just Saying) than they do about their intended targets. L3 and Other Just Saying (what catchy nicknames, obviously embarrassed or ashamed to use their real names) are undoubtedly using the primitive psychological mechanism of “projection”, accusing others of exactly what they don’t like about themselves. (My distaste of personal attacks precludes me from writing what I probably should write about these two.)

  15. @Harry: If you make comments like

    “Not very much different than a Wall Street trophy wife. Or Marla Maples or Melania Trump”

    especially in an unrelated thread, then you should expect to get your head handed to you!

    You forfeited any right to respect and it won’t do you any good going whining to Daddy, er Gary, because you are criticized.

    You fatheaded, bigoted windbag.

  16. L3: Comments about public figures, especially political figures, are generally accepted. My comments were related; Gary posted about a gold-digger, I offered examples of other gold-diggers. An intelligent discussion, devoid of personal attacks, would be welcome but anything intelligent is obviously beyond your capabilities, you moron. You’re probably very familiar with fatheaded, bigoted windbags, obviously see one in the mirror every day. Again with the projection, you obviously know that YOU are a fatheaded, bigoted windbag so you quickly accuse others of those qualities. You douchebag, just like your hero; say you’re fighting back when you’re really a bully starting the fight. You coward, still afraid to use your real name.

  17. L3 +1.

    @Harry. My comment in essence was “Twinkle twinkle little star, what you say [about the President and his wives] is what you are” in politically correct terminology [since it is inappropriate for me to assume the preferred genders], and you are outraged? Seriously. Maybe you should start out by treating the President with civilized respect.

  18. Hey, I made a ditty.

    Gender neutral Rog,
    Did the gender neutral dog,
    Under the slimy rotten log,
    In the proverbial bog.
    Schmuck, muck, YUUUUCK!!!

  19. Other Just Saying: The president is far from civilized and respectful in his treatment of others (endless name calling and insults and lies), I treat him the same way.

  20. Harry the hypocrite wrote…

    “An intelligent discussion, devoid of personal attacks, would be welcome but…”

    “anything intelligent is obviously beyond your capabilities, you moron.”

    “You’re probably very familiar with fatheaded, bigoted windbags, obviously see one in the mirror every day.”

    “Again with the projection, you obviously know that YOU are a fatheaded, bigoted windbag…”

    “You douchebag …”

    Deeply thoughtful and moving comments. You contribute so much to this group. How did we get by without you?

  21. L3: “Deeply thoughtful and moving comments. You contribute so much to this group.”, thanks for the compliment. You schmuck. Hypocrite the best you can do. YOU started this with your gratuitous insults, I merely replied in the same vein. Now you whine and complain that I don’t contribute anything. You’re the hypocrite, chastising me for the exact same behavior as your hero Donnie the Douchebag. Please crawl back under whatever rock you crawled out from.

  22. @Harry the halfwit. Pathologists have a lot of descriptions for turds, you are only one of them.

    Don’t feel unwanted!

  23. L3: Took you all of 13 minutes to attack me again, not much of a life. Again with the projection, calling me a halfwit. “Deeply thoughtful and moving comments. You contribute so much to this group. How did we get by without you?”, that’s the definition of hypocritical, you hypocrite. It’s interesting that you initiate gratuitous insults of someone you don’t even know, you arrogant narcissistic troll. Your repulsive behavior is identical to that of your beloved Douchebag in Chief and a big part of the reason over half of voters didn’t vote for him and don’t approve of him. Still hiding behind that catchy little nickname, you coward. Thank you for, with your projection and hypocrisy, writing my comments for me; YOU actually ARE unwanted, here and probably everywhere else.

  24. @Harry the halfwit:
    And you took only 18 minutes. Harry, the hypocrite, halfwit with the head size problem has nothing to do while waiting in line for his unemployment check. Time for your meds.

  25. L3: Thank you, “imitation is the highest form of flattery, but it reflects the lowest level of intelligence and imagination.” There you go again; projection, verifiable lies and writing about something you’re ignorant of. You have no idea of my health or head size or employment status yet you choose to insult, you complete bullying lying POS. Undoubtedly more projection due to your psychosis and lack of a job, it’s hard to believe the terms of your probation allow this. You started it, don’t expect to get away with it. As much as I dislike it, I’ll defend myself and stand up to a bully. Douchebags like you like to say: “never bring knife to a gunfight”. If you had any education at all, you’d also remember “I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.” Didn’t work out so well for the Japanese, probably won’t work out for you either.

  26. @Harry: “what catchy nicknames, obviously embarrassed or ashamed to use their real names”

    Also @Harry: “You coward, still afraid to use your real name.”

    Best @Harry: “I did NOT understand that my last name would be included in my comments and replies to my comments. Please remove my last name from all comments and replies.”

    I sense a bit of dissonance here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *