About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Comments

  1. Whilst not the main point of this, flying Tallinn to Varna is not flying to the EU but within it as both Estonia and Bulgaria are EU member states. Further, whilst it probably should be given the contents of this story, Fly Armenia is not actually listed on the EASA blacklist, there are seven from Armenia though.

  2. 737-300? What’s next? MD-80’s? 747-SP’s?

    I’d say that if they’re going through this much work for a 20-30 year old aircraft that the sanctions are working.

  3. So what is the implied message here?

    I never understood how (by refusing to export safer aviation equipment) making Iranian civil aviation less safe would help further any strategic goals of the US, or the West in general.

    I would certainly like to see a more secular and democratic Iran. But this extreme sanction approach is simply illogical and solely driven by ideological dogmatism.

  4. EJC, look at the regs more closely. They’ve banned all airlines from Armenia, without exception.

  5. I don’t like Iran (nor do I like the globalist controlled U.S. government), but I feel it’s ridiculous to sanction a country for something that in no way contributes to any military proliferation. Commercial airlines serve the public. Making Iranian commercial air travel less safe doesn’t help anyone. Why wouldn’t the U.S. and Europe take Iranian oil money. It makes no sense.

    I personally don’t believe in sanctions for any conduct that happens in a sovereign country.

Comments are closed.