About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Pingbacks

Comments

  1. I fear AA won’t be long in sending him back to his previous opinion on airline investments

  2. the good news about Warren Buffett purchasing too much Delta Airlines stock is eventually, he’ll find someone to take it off his hands even if it results in him taking a small loss, which I doubt he’ll experience.

  3. @Jim… yes, this is news for several reasons. Reminds me that SWA may be grabbed. I didn’t know that BRK owns the main 4 airlines, like a mutual fund. What about AlaskaAir. Buffet doesn’t want the busy work of airline mgmt but does like the current profits.
    Yep, I would call this news.

  4. I like the subtle play in your graphic, the usual negative shot at Delta with the graph indicating a losing investment. If Warren had read your column consistently and bought a healthy percentage of AA 5 years ago, that would be the appropriate graph.

  5. Interesting. Buying more than 10% of a company triggers a mandatory pre-acquisition Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filing and mandatory 30 day ( or longer) pre-acquisition waiting period with the FTC and the Department of Justice, by both the acquirer and the acquired company. This is true even if, like Buffett and Berkshire-Hathaway usually contend, it is only for investment purposes. (The “investment only” exception to HSR covers only acquisitions of less than 10%.).

    Wonder how Buffett and Delta handled this one?

  6. This story may be missing a few details. I believe that when a stock buyback is started, the company sends letters to stockholders offering to repurchase their shares. Given the nature of laws involving large investors, those letters would be more important to large investors than small investors. Someone at BRK dropped the ball and either did not accept or acknowledge Deltas offer to repurchase their shares, or didn’t decline the offer and sell the shares on the open market to reduce ownership. This action would have reduced the numerator. It may have also triggered some income tax on gains?? It would be highly irresponsible for an actively managed ‘fund’ like BRK to not be aware of news involving a large company in which they own more than 4%, even more so at 10%.
    Perhaps BRK is too big to manage?

Comments are closed.