The Reliability Paradox: Why American Airlines Can’t Outpace Delta Even As It Improves (And Delta Falters)

For several years American Airlines has said that if they could get their operation running well, everything else would fall into place. But they’ve been running well in 2023 and they aren’t making money. There’s something wrong with the American Airlines business plan.

American Airlines has had a basic model for how to succeed.

  • They need to become reliable. If they’re a reliable airline everyone will be happy with them. If they are unreliable nobody will be happy. Reliability matters a lot more than product and service. In fact, CEO Robert Isom frequently says “the food tastes better” when planes run on time.

  • The network and schedule are the product. They want to offer the best connections through Dallas and Charlotte, with the most convenient schedule for people all over the country to travel to major destinations – especially across the Sun Belt and Mexico.

  • International long haul is a waste. They can fly to international partner hubs (London, Madrid, Tokyo, Sydney) and summer seasonal Europe, but anything else is just too expensive in employees, staff, and fuel to make money. They’re much better off taking an aircraft and operating several short frequencies than one long one (or half of a long one).

In this model the details of the seats, of inflight catering, of the lounges, don’t much matter.

  • They need to check the box – seats are necessary, but they did not even bother to build a cabin mockup for their new domestic product that debuted with the Boeing 737 MAX, and then they retrofitted their fleet with.

  • It turns out that the configuration of the galleys, the bathrooms, and the first class seats was bad so they had to go and retrofit all the interiors they’d just changed out. Penny wise, and pound foolish.

  • Meanwhile if they put three different dishes on a tray with lettuce, it still checks the box of a meal, and they can outsource business and first class wine selection to Intervine and call it good – there’s no need for Australian wines on Sydney flights if sourcing those is more complicated or expensive. It’s a detail no one is going to be rewarded for internally for getting right.

This year customer demand turned heavily international, but American Airlines retired their Boeing 757 and 767 fleet and their Airbus A330s – planes they could have sent to international destinations. With Boeing’s deliveries slowed, American lacked the aircraft to fly what people wanted to buy.

The problem American Airlines now faces is that they have become much more reliable, and they offer a robust domestic route network, but they still aren’t making money. They’re not just financially behind Delta, but also United.

Delta no longer has the operational advantage they once did. American has gotten better and Delta has gotten worse. But Delta makes the most money and they talk over and over about premium, premium, premium. Their seats aren’t really better. Their meals aren’t better. Their club lounge food is better, but the lines are longer to get in and busier once you’re inside (because Amex’s premium cardmembers get in, not just Amex’s Reserve Delta cardmembers). SkyMiles isn’t very good. But they repeat premium like a mantra and it frames their thinking in a way that it doesn’t at American for everything except its own corporate headquarters.

The presentation that American Airlines gave to employees after their third quarter earnings call on Thursday – a quarter in which they lost money – was more of the same. They filled 84% of their seats. They cancelled a smaller percentage of their flights than any other third quarter in their history and outperformed their peers and they’re leading in on-time departures.

The American Airlines operation has improved a lot.. and they still aren’t making money! But their goals are stuck in 2018.

American Airlines is a high cost airline and can only therefore make money as a high revenue airline. That means earning a revenue premium relative to their peers. They need to sell more premium seats at higher fares. For that they:

  1. Need more premium seats to sell. This management team has removed business class seats from Boeing 787 and 777 aircraft, and has talked for years about adding them to Airbus A319s but has not done so.

  2. Need to offer a premium product that customers will pay more for. That isn’t just reliability, though reliability is necessary. Reliability is a table stake. Once customers stop ruling you out due to lack of reliability, it becomes hard to earn a revenue premium off of it – Delta used to by going months on end without cancelling a mainline flight. That’s not something they do anymore or that American is likely within reach of.

    Another strategy is friendlier service, but cabin crew are uniquely unhappy over lack of a contract. American should be offering more money in exchange for terms which hold employees accountable for service delivery but they are not doing so.

    Contra the airline’s recent past, they need to sweat the details from seat comfort to food and beverage, no detail of customer experience is too small, and the workflow of every interaction through the mobile app matters.

They need to stop playing small ball, running away from competitive markets because other airlines offer a more compelling product. They need to offer a more compelling product that customers will choose over competitors, and fly where people want to go. Otherwise managers ought to just go play golf. There’s too much capital at stake to do anything else.

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Pingbacks

Comments

  1. Well this has certainly been an interesting evening for me.
    A most fascinating comment section today. I wish that people would not get personal and just say “no, I think you are wrong.” And I’m not perfect, I too have let my emotions get the best of me but I’ve tried hard to banish that demon. I do thank you all for the many fascinating ideas and the look into a world I will never participate in due to disability, poverty and disinterest in traveling.
    I have no where to go and all day to get there, so I’ll just take the bus. I wish you all the best!

  2. I love that you accuse me of being exactly what you are! A troll on someone else’s site.

    It obviously isn’t clear to you but AA and DL are the #1 and #2 LEGACY carriers in MOST US markets. UA has long been strong only in hubs. The difference, since you clearly don’t grasp it, is that Delta is gaining share in major LARGE and COMPETITIVE markets where AA used to be a whole lot stronger.
    You need only look at NYC and LAX to see that. DL has dramatically improved its share at both LARGE coastal cities at AA’s expense.

    You are free to believe whatever you want about DL and DFW – but it is clear that you are more interested in throwing dirt than critically thinking.
    DL moved its connecting operation OUT OF DFW but didn’t lose the local market. They gained far more than what they gave up – which were a handful of markets such as Louisiana and Arkansas to the west coast which connect well over Texas hubs and not many other places. The concept is way too complex for you to grasp but DL reallocated its DFW hub resources better than any other airline.

    You do realize that AA ITSELF also closed RDU and BNA and DL is the largest airline at RDU while WN is the largest airline at BNA? Tell us where AA shifted its resources and gained anything.

    You are free to argue all you want but AA has simply been repeatedly outfoxed by DL – and AA’s current predicament shows it.

  3. As a former US Airways AA employee, many of us are disgusted at this management team that continues making us America West on crack. We need management who knows how to run an international airline and isn’t reactionary. The barfed when we found out DP and company would be in charge.

  4. Absent a total housecleaning at the Headquarters and Board Room, American will always be an “also ran.” The only tangible Parker and company brought to AA when they took over was dragging it down to the level of USAir – bottom feeder. When it comes to the real driver of success it centers around a top-notch end product for their customers which will never happen in this era.

  5. Spot on article, I could not agree more ( as I wait for my over 2 hour delayed AA flight). However, it sure doesn’t feel like AA is any more reliable than in the past.

  6. @Tim Dunn – “You do realize that AA ITSELF also closed RDU and BNA and DL is the largest airline at RDU while WN is the largest airline at BNA? Tell us where AA shifted its resources and gained anything.”

    Uhhh….Miami.

  7. For sure, a high-cost airline can only turn a profit by earning a revenue premium. This, in turn, can only happen when people are consistently willing to pay more to fly the carrier. Reliability is necessary but insufficient. The fact of the matter is that AA has improved reliability at the expense of every other ingredient that would make for a premium experience. I agree, DL’s reliability is not what it once was. However, I have never not received a PDB, and if I may quibble with something, their meals are actually quite good. I have never felt like self-loading cargo on DL. So, yes, AA flights have to be substantially cheaper and more convenient before I will consider flying them. When I pay to fly up front, I expect more than just a reliable flight.

  8. The cactus team if failing miserably at running a worldwide airline. Their AW regional mentality is showing and it is not pretty. The BOD needs to get off the rears and get new management to salvage what is left.

Comments are closed.