Tampa Airport Wants Passengers To Stop Wearing Pajamas—Their Absurd Dress Code Is Almost Certainly Illegal

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy wants airline passengers to improve their manners and their attire. His campaign is called “The Golden Age of Travel Starts with You.” Tampa airport agrees. They want a ban on passengers wearing pajamas.

People aren’t sure if this is real. Some folks don’t like a government entity trolling the way a person or company might (“It’s funny when Wendy’s has a troll account. Less funny when a taxpayer funded agency does it” – though the airport is broadly airline and passenger-funded, but it does receive taxpayer grants). .

Delta flies to Amsterdam from Tampa. British Airways flies to London Gatwick and Virgin Atlantic has London Heathrow.. Lufthansa’s DIscover flies to Frankfurt and Edelweiss serves Zurich. Presumably putting on pajamas once on the aircraft would be acceptable.

I bring a pair of airline pajamas (the same airline when possible, but at least the same airline group or a joint venture partner when absolutely necessary) and I’ll change into the when still on the ground at the start of an overnight transoceanic flight.

In terms of actually imposing restrictions on dress, what’s important to understand is:

An airport can have rules on expression, including clothing, that are tied to safety and operations, content-neutral, clear and applied evenly. There’s likely no problem with a rule against nudity in the airport, though this is also usually going to be redundant with state law so not even needed. There can also be requirements to wear shoes! That’s a safety and sanitation issue.

But anything that discriminates against a particular viewpoint is usually not going to pass scrutiny. And content-based “civility” rules are going to be tough in a public airport, though an airline can do it in their space within the airport. An airport can’t ban offensive language t-shirts, but an airline can (Cohen v. California is the classic case on government clothing restrictions dealing with a specific viewpoint.)

Airports can’t offer vague rules. Those lean into discretion, and lead to selective enforcement. That ends up as viewpoint discrimination. Ban pajamas has to answer what even counts as pajamas. You don’ thave to get to viewpoint here to have a problem with vagueness. What about onesies or hospital scrubs? What about if young kids are wearing their pajamas onto a long haul flight, or before a 5 a.m. departure? We quickly get into discretionary enforcement which is a problem.

In Florida you’ve also got their Religious Freedom Restoration Act which bans government entities from burdening a person’s religious exercise, including attire, without a compelling state interest and demonstration that doing so is the least restrictive means of accomplishing that objective. That makes it tough for airports to ban head coverings, for instance.

Airlines, restaurants bars and other private businesses operating in an airport can have their own rules like “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Dice.” And in fact, airlines put this into their contracts of carriage.

  • American Airlines: passengers must “dress appropriately; bare feet or offensive clothing aren’t allowed.”

  • Delta: may refuse transport when a passenger’s “conduct, attire, hygiene or odor creates an unreasonable risk of offense or annoyance to other passengers.”

  • United: can refuse passengers who are “barefoot, not properly clothed, or whose clothing is lewd, obscene or offensive.”

  • Southwest bans “offensive behavior,” including wearing clothes that are “lewd, obscene, or patently offensive.”

Tampa’s airport isn’t actually going to ban wearing pajamas. And I think there are times where pajamas are fine and certainly far better than what many people wear!

Tampa isn’t really going to police pajamas—but this viral stunt perfectly captures the absurdity of trying to regulate passenger attire, and probably wouldn’t even withstand judicial scrutiny if they tried.

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Comments

  1. This is obviously a joke, their social media game is great. When someone asked who would determine whether or not something is pajamas they said the giant flamingo mascot would be the decider.

  2. Pajamas are not the worst of it, by far. Morbidly obese women in skimpy tank tops and essentially underwear and to be fair almost always older morbidly obese men trying to wear a muscle tank top. And there ain’t no muscle to be had or seen.

    Not sure if an airport could regulate a dress code. Once Spirit and Frontier leave the skies I suspect we won’t see as much of it.

  3. Yes, TIA has a great and humorous PR department. That said, wearing of pajamas in such a public place suggests to me just how much respect the wearer must have for themselves and those around them. Be interesting to survey the pajama-wearers-per-airline ratio. Maybe bright yellow pajamas would be a clue?

  4. I have a strong dislike of the excessive use of periods in sentences. Once that happens, the beginning of the message and the rest of the message have no meaning or importance to me. It is just blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

  5. TPA is actually a decent airport. Really like their train system between the main terminal and rental car center. Sure, it can get crowded at times (and the SkyClub could be larger), but at least they have a massive flamingo to look at.

  6. TPA is the best domestic airport. With a social media presence to match. And they have an excellent flamingo.

    I for one prefer my governmental agencies to have a sense of humor. Go pick on MIA or MCO. Their airports are terrible and they aren’t particularly funny either.

  7. Sorry Gary, but this is a really pathetic article. First, there is no “ban”, just a request. Second, it’s obviously a lighthearted message not to be taken seriously. It does not warrant a lengthy review of legal authority. Gary, you can do better. However, including the bikini clad women was a nice touch, but why not the naked airport crazies?

  8. I’m fully support this! I’m sick of adults showing up like they just rolled out of bed in Pj’s and slippers. No one has any self respect.

  9. Ha-haa!

    @1990 — Big fan of the flamingo as well. Agreed, solid airport – just wish you could walk between concourses.

  10. As the Community Note mentions, this is not a real policy but just the social media folks being silly, as confirmed by the subsequent statement from the airport. However, this does show the problems with using official communication channels in humorous ways.

  11. People cannot afford rent & food, yet the Felon-in-chief claims gasoline is less that $2. His ICESTAPO is kidnapping and murdering people on the streets and this is what concerns our cunts in government.

    Isn’t this what magicians do? Distract you with some business with the right hand while the left hand conceals the deception?

    I’m glad I’m old and will be dead soon and won’t have to live in this country that has become so foreign to me.

  12. Ryanair ran a campaign suggesting that in 2026 it is inappropriate to wear jeans on a plane. I took it as a PR grab. I will wear jeans on a flight with them this summer, and I guarantee I’ll look better than the vast majority of males wearing shorts.

  13. Somebody needs to do a welfare check on @Derek McGillicuddy. He posted with proper use of upper and lower case.

  14. @This Comes To Mind — Haha very good observation…what are the odds that we have two Derek McGillicuddy’s frequenting this site!?

  15. If you are boarding the plane in pajamas, I hate to say that you are part of the problem. Eww. Have the tiniest bit of class and respect for others.

    If you want to go to the lavatory and change into PJs after takeoff (and back again before landing) I think that’s acceptable. But PJs in the lounge? Walking through the terminal? I’d be fine with security hauling you off.

    Businesses and facilities can have dress codes, so long as they are publicized.

  16. Gary fretting about legality issues again regarding an obviously non serious suggestion. When will leftists start caring about actual crime, and not just frivolous procedural crime? Dems only care about actual crime when it somehow benefits them politically, but crickets when it doesn’t.

  17. I say, if people aren’t mature enough to get dressed to go out in public , let them, but then they can’t complain when people ridicule them for looking like toddlers.

  18. @Derek McGillicuddy — Kudos on the limited use of ALL-CAPS, friend. (For real, @L737, @This comes to mind).

    @Mantis — How are all those ‘leftists’ treating you in Asia these days? Since, you know, you abandoned the US and moved over there, just to post on travel sites griping about your former homeland.

  19. Having seen what some people wear before they board, there should be standards that are enforced. Pajamas (full sleeves and legs) are fine, in fact better than what I’ve seen some people wearing.

  20. This article is fun. Thanks Gary! What straight man doesn’t appreciate scantily clad attractive young women? Be honest. Don’t lie to yourself.
    How we dress and carry ourselves will definitely affect how we are treated.
    I like to dress conservative with shirts with a collar and pants.

    Why is Gary dressed like Dr. Evil from the Austin Powers movies?? Is he secretly evil?
    Just kidding Gary! You are dressed like the owner of a luxury resort. I respect.

  21. This goes back to something I’ve stated before. I am a commercial pilot, too. When I see people dressed in pajamas, shorts, flip flops and the like, they are the ones that will be injured should there be a serious accident. They will be burned. They will be injured. They might even die. So might others dressed more appropriately but in an emergency evacuation, I’m getting the hell away from that plane as fast as I can. I wear long pants, long sleeve shirts and appropriate shoes. When I hit that slide, I only have my wallet, keys and passport. That’s it. With any luck, I’ll walk away relatively unscathed. My chances are a hell of a lot better than those in pajamas, etc.

  22. I Iive in St. Petersburg and our beloved TPA has a sense of humor. We see funny posts all the time.
    This is humorous
    People ! Really ???

Comments are closed.