FAA Drone Ban Looks Like An Attempt To Stop People Filming ICE [Roundup]

News and notes from around the interweb:

  • The FAA’s “Temporary” Flight Restriction for Drones is a Blatant Attempt to Criminalize Filming ICE

    The FAA regularly issues temporary flight restrictions (TFRs) to prevent people from flying into designated airspace. TFRs are usually issued during natural disasters, or to protect major sporting events and government officials like the president, and in most cases last mere hours.

    Not so with the restriction numbered FDC 6/4375, which started on January 16, 2026. This TFR lasts for 21 months—until October 29, 2027—and covers the entire nation. It prevents any person from flying any unmanned aircraft (i.e., a drone) within 3000 feet, measured horizontally, of any of the “facilities and mobile assets,” including “ground vehicle convoys and their associated escorts,” of the Departments of Defense, Energy, Justice, and Homeland Security. Violators can be subject to criminal and civil penalties, and risk having their drones seized or destroyed.

    In practical terms, this TFR means that anyone flying their drone within a half mile of an ICE or CBP agent’s car (a DHS “mobile asset”) is liable to face criminal charges and have their drone shot down.

  • Here’s a paean to Scott Kirby. It’s still not proven that his large aircraft orderes were right, but growing domestic capacity surely was, investing in the airline’s technology was, and he’s gotten very good at telling a story (for which he’s not always held accountable, he is currently telling a story about growing MileagePlus revenue 50% in 4 years and no one remembers he said the same thing in 2021).

    I love that he’s a CEO with a clear vision of the world, a thesis that he can articulate to align the company. Even when he was Presiden of American he was the most interesting person in the industry to listen to on earnings calls (even if I was so often banging my head against the wall doing so, and everything American was doing turned out to be wrong).

  • American Airlines: “Customers now have more opportunities to purchase ancillary products when checking in on the AA app.” Yay?

  • U.S. immigration preclearance at Abu Dhabi has been temporarily closed.

  • There is nothing premium about queueing.

    Centurion Hong Kong Queue (source: local HK whatsapp group)
    by
    u/bbbb in
    AmexPlatinum

  • Did I realize that Chase Sapphire Reserve has a magazine? Vaguely. Or that American Express Departures still exists online?

  • Park Hyatt Tokyo claims to be a resort – to avoid offering elite late check-out? Seems like dirty pool.


    Park Hyatt Tokyo Pool

  • The group headed to Fukuoka, Japan originated in Pensacola, Florida.

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Comments

  1. NOTAM FDC 6/4375 includes ‘mobile assets’ and ‘ground vehicle convoys’… uh, ok, good luck enforcing that, because, it’s one thing to restrict airspace on fixed GPS coordinates… and another thing to do no-fly-zones that move and change on a whim.

    There should be some reasonable regulation and enforcement on boundaries for drones, in-general. It’s a relatively new technology that can and does get in the way of legitimate government and civilian operations, like those drones by airports leading to ground-stops.

    Where this gets wild is the package delivery drones in places like mainland China, which are already getting out of hand there, so say reports…

  2. This gives the government another blank check to suppress the public. A nationwide DNF can be enforced or not enforced simply by the mood of the officer. The officer could allow a “friendly” drone operator to fly while shutting down others. I agree that there do need to be DNF zones at places like airports, prisons, and stadiums. However, a nationwide ban is not only unreasonable, but it is also extremely questionable legally. The US is being turned into a police state one step at a time and most either don’t see it, or don’t understand the danger.

  3. @Gene, @Ron — Friends, what will be interesting is when this current regime is out of power, and actual adults regain the reigns, will they just grandfather in the authoritarianism, like post-Patriot Act? Because, usually, when privacy and rights are given away, we don’t get them back easily.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *