Chicago O’Hare Has Its Own Rap For Taxiing Aircraft Now – And It’s Awesome [Roundup]

News and notes from around the interweb:

About Gary Leff

Gary Leff is one of the foremost experts in the field of miles, points, and frequent business travel - a topic he has covered since 2002. Co-founder of frequent flyer community InsideFlyer.com, emcee of the Freddie Awards, and named one of the "World's Top Travel Experts" by Conde' Nast Traveler (2010-Present) Gary has been a guest on most major news media, profiled in several top print publications, and published broadly on the topic of consumer loyalty. More About Gary »

More articles by Gary Leff »

Comments

  1. Marriott follows sensible consumer protections… but only in an authoritarian totalitarian state. *facepalm*

  2. You should read the article in the WSJ today – Private Credit Is on the Hunt for Credit-Card Debt. It’s all about Bilt and how the deal basically came together at the last minute once Bilt satisfied additional demands by Blue Owl, including a guarantee that Blue Owl would get the first dollars out as well as giving Blue Owl further diligence rights into its forward-looking projections. The article says the deal only got done the night before Wells transferred its balances. Not only does that sound like a complete mess, but Blue Owl itself has been in the headlines this month with a complete mess of its own, with surging redemption requests and Moody’s cutting Blue Owl’s outlook from stable to negative.

    Yikes.

  3. O’hare had 992,000 flights in 2004 witth fewer runways. It now has 8 instead of 7 and has 6 parallel which makes it easier instead of 2, but yet they are still capping flights.

  4. (Bilt? More like Biltricide… I think it’s medicine for treating parasites… oh, how fitting.)

  5. @Peter – here’s the relevant snippet, Blue Owl (which has had well-publicized withdrawals capped from unrelated funds) was one of several financing providers for acquiring balances from Wells. And there’s no reporting on a guarantee of first dollars out being agreed to, just that Blue Owl sought to extract that.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/private-credit-is-on-the-hunt-for-credit-card-debt/ar-AA21euCL

    “In the Bilt deal, the credit-card debt was moved to Fidem Financial, which acts as a balance sheet and gets funding for the program from Goldman, TD, Blue Owl and Stone Point. (Stone Point is also an owner of Fidem.)

    Shortly before the Bilt deal was scheduled to be finalized in early February, Blue Owl raised concerns: It wouldn’t continue with the deal, it told parties involved in it, unless several things occurred.

    Blue Owl wanted a guarantee that would involve its receiving the first tens of millions of dollars of profit generated by the credit-card program and wanted to dig more into the feasibility of Bilt’s forward-looking projections, according to people familiar with the matter.

    Blue Owl blessed the deal on the eve before the card program was scheduled to transfer its balances away from Wells Fargo.”

    There’s also no reporting here on whether there was additional capital that would have replaced Blue Owl, or how much of the total they were providing. Sounds like they acted in bad faith to extract better last minute concessions, using due diligence as leverage, but unclear what they actually received.

  6. So very sad how Americans have have voted to be shafted to the point where Chinese citizens have more rights against corporations than American citizens do.

  7. @Gary – yep, and helpful to provide the additional context, but I’m not sure why it’s bad faith per se. Is it using leverage at a pivotal moment – sure. But there are plenty of club financing deals and many larger participants have last minute demands to ensure participation in the financing. A demand for first dollars out is somewhat atypical though and could be indicative of broader concerns – whether they got that, who knows. Perhaps Bilt is currently looking for different private capital providers to replace Blue Owl in the deal, perhaps they’ve satisfied Blue Owl’s diligence concerns, perhaps the turmoil with some of Blue Owl’s funds will not spill over to the rest of Blue Owl’s business (perhaps it will help slightly that the founder’s personal loans are no longer secured by Blue Owl’s shares) – who knows.

    We’re not in the room, so it’s just swirling speculation as to what actually happened. We know it was a chaotic roll out by Bilt. This just adds some potential color to the chaos.

    None of this is a judgment on the potential value that Bilt offers by way of points for spending (it’s really great value), but it is further potential color on the possible bigger picture risks of doing business with Bilt longer term. If I want smaller picture color, I can just look at the Bilt thread on Reddit. Obviously people complain more online versus giving praise, but it’s not exactly a love fest over there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *